Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Countersink possible w/ straight holes in WF2?

  1. #1
    Mike Guest

    Countersink possible w/ straight holes in WF2?

    It seems that if you're not placing a standard hole,

    that to get a countersink, you have to go to a sketched hole.

    Is this true?

    Thanks

    Mike

  2. #2
    Stu Guest
    On 19 Jul 2005 13:01:25 -0700, "Mike" <pinbuoy@comcast.net> wrote:

    It seems that if you're not placing a standard hole,

    that to get a countersink, you have to go to a sketched hole.

    Is this true?

    Thanks

    Mike
    It is a possibility, but if you make your hole go "thru all" and pick
    the screw options, you can get cbores and csinks while turning off
    threads.
    As soon as you remove the "thru all" option the hole turns into a tap.



    ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
    ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

  3. #3
    Jeff Howard Guest
    As Stu said, you can toggle "Adds tapping" (look at the button next to C'SK
    button) for thru holes.

    You can set the config option hole_diameter_override YES, input your dia
    and toggle Include thread surface Off.

    Pay attention to the hole notes you get doing either. Probably not what
    you will want to display.

    (Wonder if it's possible to set up a .hol file for doing plain blind holes
    and getting associative notes including c'sk, c'bore info? How 'bout a
    decent looking hole note for standard holes done as above? I've never
    jumped into the subject.)

    You can also "Save a Copy" the 3D Section and place it in a Favorites
    folder so it's easy to access for re-use.

    You might look at copying [ctrl+c, ctrl+v] holes instead of creating new
    holes and retrieving sections as a way to streamline the process a bit
    placing multiple holes (place and edit to suit).


    "Mike" <pinbuoy@comcast.net> wrote in message
    news:1121801396.741107.151140@g44g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
    It seems that if you're not placing a standard hole,

    that to get a countersink, you have to go to a sketched hole.

    Is this true?

    Thanks

    Mike

  4. #4
    shaun Guest
    You can make two holes or one revolve

  5. #5
    Ron M. Guest
    "Jeff Howard" <jeff4136@mindspring.com> wrote in message
    news:bpwDe.5926$dU3.2960@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
    As Stu said, you can toggle "Adds tapping" (look at the button next to
    C'SK
    button) for thru holes.

    You can set the config option hole_diameter_override YES, input your dia
    and toggle Include thread surface Off.

    Pay attention to the hole notes you get doing either. Probably not what
    you will want to display.

    (Wonder if it's possible to set up a .hol file for doing plain blind holes
    and getting associative notes including c'sk, c'bore info? How 'bout a
    decent looking hole note for standard holes done as above? I've never
    jumped into the subject.)

    You can also "Save a Copy" the 3D Section and place it in a Favorites
    folder so it's easy to access for re-use.

    You might look at copying [ctrl+c, ctrl+v] holes instead of creating new
    holes and retrieving sections as a way to streamline the process a bit
    placing multiple holes (place and edit to suit).
    UDFs are the way to go for Hole features. Even if your UDF is a Revolved Cut
    feature instead of an actual Hole feature, you can modify the dimension text
    of the UDF reference part's Hole(or Revolved Cut) feature dimensions so that
    when you 'Show' the dimensions of the UDF feature in your target model, the
    callout will appear exactly as you desire. Also, this type of callout will
    be parametric and you can drive the size of the feature from the drawing if
    your processes require 2-D drawings. Most companies have yet to go
    'drawingless'. :-)

    Ron M.

  6. #6
    W Jones Guest
    Why the f!ck can't you place a through to next hole and have a tap
    throughj? This would be extremely useful for taping through the walls
    of a cylinder. Also, why does it seem that software people have such
    a hard time putting pipe taps as part of their "standard" libraries?

    ME

    On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:25:07 -0400, Stu <Stu@kapco-tool.com> wrote:

    On 19 Jul 2005 13:01:25 -0700, "Mike" <pinbuoy@comcast.net> wrote:

    It seems that if you're not placing a standard hole,

    that to get a countersink, you have to go to a sketched hole.

    Is this true?

    Thanks

    Mike

    It is a possibility, but if you make your hole go "thru all" and pick
    the screw options, you can get cbores and csinks while turning off
    threads.
    As soon as you remove the "thru all" option the hole turns into a tap.



    ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
    ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

  7. #7
    Jeff Howard Guest
    It seems that if you're not placing a standard hole,
    that to get a countersink, you have to go to a sketched hole.
    Is this true?
    http://www.mcadcentral.com/proe/foru...TID=28011&PN=1

    will give you standard holes for (inch) number, letter and fractional drill
    diameters.

Similar Threads

  1. straight threads?
    By dlevy in forum SolidWorks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-08-2005, 09:10 AM
  2. Thousands of holes
    By MG in forum SolidWorks
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-23-2005, 02:20 PM
  3. Need help dimensioning holes
    By P. in forum SolidWorks
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-02-2005, 01:38 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-10-2005, 10:13 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-31-2004, 08:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Other forums: Access Forum - Microsoft Office Forum - Exchange Server Forum