Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: what I would really like

  1. #1
    dakeb Guest

    what I would really like

    To be able to create a cut feature comprising a number of holes and later
    convert it to a pattern table.

  2. #2
    David Janes Guest
    : "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote
    : To be able to create a cut feature comprising a number of holes and later
    : convert it to a pattern table.
    :
    I've done something similar by patterning a point or axis (don't remember which),
    reference patterning a cut, then turning this into a pattern table and eliminating
    some of the elements. Now, it's possible to do somewhat the same thing with a fill
    pattern and selectively delete pattern elements.

    David Janes

  3. #3
    dakeb Guest
    "David Janes" <djanes@cox.net.invallud> wrote in message
    news:N_gid.92581$cJ3.70146@fed1read06...
    : "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote
    : To be able to create a cut feature comprising a number of holes and
    later
    : convert it to a pattern table.
    :
    I've done something similar by patterning a point or axis (don't remember
    which),
    reference patterning a cut, then turning this into a pattern table and
    eliminating
    some of the elements. Now, it's possible to do somewhat the same thing
    with a fill
    pattern and selectively delete pattern elements.
    It's deleting the unwanted elements that's the problem. In rel 2001 you
    can't do it graphically, you have to do it in a text file and that is a
    major headache. If I could just select the instances I don't want in the
    model and delete them that'd be okay. Can you do this in WF?

    Why can't PTC make a pattern table from a cut? All the dimensions exist in
    the cut, it would simply have to convert them to the table format.

  4. #4
    David Janes Guest
    : "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote :
    : > "David Janes" <djanes@cox.net.invallud> wrote
    : > : "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote
    : > : To be able to create a cut feature comprising a number of holes and
    : later
    : > : convert it to a pattern table.
    : > :
    : > I've done something similar by patterning a point or axis (don't remember
    : which),
    : > reference patterning a cut, then turning this into a pattern table and
    : eliminating
    : > some of the elements. Now, it's possible to do somewhat the same thing
    : with a fill
    : > pattern and selectively delete pattern elements.
    :
    : It's deleting the unwanted elements that's the problem. In rel 2001 you
    : can't do it graphically, you have to do it in a text file and that is a
    : major headache. If I could just select the instances I don't want in the
    : model and delete them that'd be okay. Can you do this in WF?
    :
    WF lets you select elements of a fill pattern graphically for suppression. It also
    lets you switch between different types of patterns (linear, table, fill) from a
    drop down list. The tough thing with a table is, as you pointed out, managing
    anything. It's pretty difficult to change the pattern spacing in either or both
    directions. With WF, you can switch to linear pattern to change the spacing then
    switch back to table to remove instances.

    : Why can't PTC make a pattern table from a cut? All the dimensions exist in
    : the cut, it would simply have to convert them to the table format.
    :
    I can't see why you wouldn't be able to except that if it's a collection of
    features, you may have to group them first. Seems to me that anything you can
    pattern, you should be able to make 'to table'. Graphical control comes with fill
    patterns because you get a preview of instance positions where you can delete
    some; not sure about tables in WF, though I'm pretty sure that by WF2 this gets
    graphical, too.

    David Janes
    :

  5. #5
    dakeb Guest
    "David Janes" <djanes@cox.net.invallud> wrote in message
    news:d1zid.92781$cJ3.20770@fed1read06...
    : "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote :
    : > "David Janes" <djanes@cox.net.invallud> wrote
    : > : "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote
    : > : To be able to create a cut feature comprising a number of holes and
    : later
    : > : convert it to a pattern table.
    : > :
    : > I've done something similar by patterning a point or axis (don't
    remember
    : which),
    : > reference patterning a cut, then turning this into a pattern table and
    : eliminating
    : > some of the elements. Now, it's possible to do somewhat the same thing
    : with a fill
    : > pattern and selectively delete pattern elements.
    :
    : It's deleting the unwanted elements that's the problem. In rel 2001 you
    : can't do it graphically, you have to do it in a text file and that is a
    : major headache. If I could just select the instances I don't want in the
    : model and delete them that'd be okay. Can you do this in WF?
    :
    WF lets you select elements of a fill pattern graphically for suppression.
    It also
    lets you switch between different types of patterns (linear, table, fill)
    from a
    drop down list. The tough thing with a table is, as you pointed out,
    managing
    anything. It's pretty difficult to change the pattern spacing in either or
    both
    directions. With WF, you can switch to linear pattern to change the
    spacing then
    switch back to table to remove instances.

    : Why can't PTC make a pattern table from a cut? All the dimensions exist
    in
    : the cut, it would simply have to convert them to the table format.
    :
    I can't see why you wouldn't be able to except that if it's a collection
    of
    features, you may have to group them first. Seems to me that anything you
    can
    pattern, you should be able to make 'to table'. Graphical control comes
    with fill
    patterns because you get a preview of instance positions where you can
    delete
    some; not sure about tables in WF, though I'm pretty sure that by WF2 this
    gets
    graphical, too.
    The thing is, I want to make a pattern of something that isn't a logical
    pattern. Like a 'random' array of round cuts, with no linear spacing in any
    direction. So in rel 2001 I have to do it as a cut feature, with the
    'random' array of round cuts drawn in sketcher. The reason I want to make it
    into a pattern is so I can use the round cuts as pilot holes, and then place
    a tapped hole feature on the first one and ref. pattern the rest of them.

  6. #6
    Jeff Howard Guest
    This is new stuff to me, can't claim to know anything about it; but that's
    never stopped me before so.... <g>

    The thing is, I want to make a pattern of something
    that isn't a logical pattern. Like a 'random' array of
    round cuts, with no linear spacing in any direction.
    So in rel 2001 I have to do it as a cut feature, with the
    'random' array of round cuts drawn in sketcher. The
    reason I want to make it into a pattern is so I can use
    the round cuts as pilot holes, and then place a tapped
    hole feature on the first one and ref. pattern the rest of
    them.
    Without an available function and just off the top of my head (well, after
    a little 'thought', fwiw) I think I'd consider table patterning datum
    points for the pilot holes, assuming they are all located from a common
    reference, instead of going the multiple holes with a cut route. I don't
    think WF offers any help for adding or deleting pattern instances
    graphically, but you can RMB / Edit the locating dimensions graphically
    (WF2 only?). It's not especially quick, the entire part has to be regen'd
    to effect changes, but it's more intuitive than working with the table (?).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Other forums: Access Forum - Microsoft Office Forum - Exchange Server Forum