Pim
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:53 pm Post subject:
Multi-extrude in one part |
|
|
Hello,
Does anybody know a simple way to create an extrusion on multiple lines
in Pro/E inside the same part?
I'm working on a steel construction of a total building. I have the
lines that represent the hart of the steel beams.
A single extrusion works fine on one line only, but the as soon as the
extrusion are intersecting, Pro/E refuses to create the geometry.
Creating all different parts is no solution, because I have over 250
elements.
Can anyone think of a solution?
Thanks for responses,
Pim Marsman.
|
|
David Janes
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:57 am Post subject:
Re: Multi-extrude in one part |
|
|
: "Pim" <blabla@hotmail.com> wrote
: Hello,
:
: Does anybody know a simple way to create an extrusion on multiple lines
: in Pro/E inside the same part?
:
: I'm working on a steel construction of a total building. I have the
: lines that represent the hart of the steel beams.
:
: A single extrusion works fine on one line only, but the as soon as the
: extrusion are intersecting, Pro/E refuses to create the geometry.
:
Trying to do this with thin protrusions or surfaces bomb with error messages, like
multiple loops must all be closed. Doesn't look like either of these will work as
I thought they might. Don't see why you wouldn't be able to create an i-beam with
either thin protrusion or surface technique.
: Creating all different parts is no solution, because I have over 250
: elements.
:
If they are all similarly shaped in cross section, couldn't you create a family of
parts, embodied in a table of variable parameters (like length, width, height)?
This should be an assembly, not a sketched feature. Even if it worked, it just
bogs sketcher to a standstill. It's not AutoCAD, just sketching draft geometry.
It's built on a variable solver which is calculating dimensions and contraints
from each piece of geometry to the existing geometry. That alone is a big job.
Complex sketches easily overwhelm sketcher, even if they don't completely fail.
David Janes |
|