| Author |
Message |
dakeb
Guest
|
 Posted:
Tue Dec 07, 2004 4:53 pm Post subject:
instances not assembling |
|
|
Guys,
Intralink 3.2 proe rel 2001
I have a problem with instances not opening for assembly in proe. This
happens if the filename is quite long. It only happens on the computer of
one user, the others are fine. If it's say, a washer, Proe gives a message
something like 'incorrect file extension sher> not allowed'. It's as if it's
truncating the filename, and reading the rest of the filename as an
extension. For instances with shorter names it works fine.
I can work around it by selecting the generic for assembly, then picking the
required instance from the list.
Also, the generic will open using File/Open.
It just won't assemble.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dave
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Janes
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:16 pm Post subject:
Re: instances not assembling |
|
|
: "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote
: Guys,
:
: Intralink 3.2 proe rel 2001
:
: I have a problem with instances not opening for assembly in proe. This
: happens if the filename is quite long. It only happens on the computer of
: one user, the others are fine. If it's say, a washer, Proe gives a message
: something like 'incorrect file extension sher> not allowed'. It's as if it's
: truncating the filename, and reading the rest of the filename as an
: extension. For instances with shorter names it works fine.
:
: I can work around it by selecting the generic for assembly, then picking the
: required instance from the list.
:
: Also, the generic will open using File/Open.
:
: It just won't assemble.
:
: Any ideas?
:
It's localized to a single computer. That's a good thing. I'd start by renaming a
local config.pro, forcing pro-e to load only default/corporate settings. If the
problem went away, you'd know to hunt for a config option. And then it could be
turning on instance accerators, limits of parameter length that the instance name
is associated with (though this seems a little too general) or even what editor is
being used for family tables and possibly rejection of certain characters in file
names. But at least if config.pro was the culprit, you'd have a place to start. I
take it that Intralink has no problem listing this instance in workspace.
David Janes
: Thanks,
:
: Dave
:
: |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dakeb
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:25 pm Post subject:
Re: instances not assembling |
|
|
"David Janes" <djanes@cox.net.invorrid> wrote in message
news:93itd.176439$cJ3.82212@fed1read06...
| Quote: | : "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote
: Guys,
:
: Intralink 3.2 proe rel 2001
:
: I have a problem with instances not opening for assembly in proe. This
: happens if the filename is quite long. It only happens on the computer
of
: one user, the others are fine. If it's say, a washer, Proe gives a
message
: something like 'incorrect file extension sher> not allowed'. It's as if
it's
: truncating the filename, and reading the rest of the filename as an
: extension. For instances with shorter names it works fine.
:
: I can work around it by selecting the generic for assembly, then picking
the
: required instance from the list.
:
: Also, the generic will open using File/Open.
:
: It just won't assemble.
:
: Any ideas?
:
It's localized to a single computer. That's a good thing. I'd start by
renaming a
local config.pro, forcing pro-e to load only default/corporate settings.
If the
problem went away, you'd know to hunt for a config option. And then it
could be
turning on instance accerators, limits of parameter length that the
instance name
is associated with (though this seems a little too general) or even what
editor is
being used for family tables and possibly rejection of certain characters
in file
names. But at least if config.pro was the culprit, you'd have a place to
start. I
take it that Intralink has no problem listing this instance in workspace.
|
It lists them in the Workspace, but doesn't list them in the proi directory
on C:
Tried different config.pro files top no avail.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dakeb
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:39 pm Post subject:
Re: instances not assembling - Solution |
|
|
Solution courtesy of Don Jordan on the Pro-user exploder:-
You may want to take a look at how long this users workspace names are. I
seem to remember an issue with very long workspace names and long part
names, when combined exceeded the proe name length allowed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
David Janes
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 4:54 pm Post subject:
Re: instances not assembling - Solution |
|
|
: "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote
: Solution courtesy of Don Jordan on the Pro-user exploder:-
:
: You may want to take a look at how long this users workspace names are. I
:
: seem to remember an issue with very long workspace names and long part
:
: names, when combined exceeded the proe name length allowed.
:
I don't really get it: how are workspace names ever combined with part names,
especially when you are opening instances from workspace to assemble them? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dakeb
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:12 pm Post subject:
Re: instances not assembling - Solution |
|
|
"David Janes" <djanes@cox.net.invorrid> wrote in message
news:IYBtd.176918$cJ3.78597@fed1read06...
| Quote: | : "dakeb" <david.bower@uk.thalesssssssspamgroup.com> wrote
: Solution courtesy of Don Jordan on the Pro-user exploder:-
:
: You may want to take a look at how long this users workspace names are.
I
:
: seem to remember an issue with very long workspace names and long part
:
: names, when combined exceeded the proe name length allowed.
:
I don't really get it: how are workspace names ever combined with part
names,
especially when you are opening instances from workspace to assemble them?
|
Jim Proctor on Pro-user tells me the limit is 63 characters.
If you are working on Proe in Ilink, it opens the object you are assembling
by current workspace name + instance name + <generic name>. It does this
even if you are selecting the object from Commonspace. Instance name +
generic name can be very long if you want a decent description in the part
name, for example, fasteners in a family table.
Strange that it doesn't do the same with File/Open. The mind boggles. IF it
has to have a limit, why can't it default to the Windows limit of 255
characters?
Workaround is to assemble the next higher generic, and select the instance
from the Window. For some reason Proe likes it better that way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in