| Author |
Message |
S Scalise
Guest
|
 Posted:
Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:06 pm Post subject:
Dimension visibility prior to placement |
|
|
ADT2005
1. When dimensioning in model space the dimension is always visible prior to
and after placement. A good thing!
2. When dimensioning model space objects in paperspace the dimension is
always visible prior to and after placement. A good thing!
3. When dimensioning model space objects in an active viewport accessed from
a layout the dimension is not visible prior to placement. Not a good thing!
Is there a variable that allows dimension visibility prior to placement in 3
above?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Ferguson
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:14 am Post subject:
Re: Dimension visibility prior to placement |
|
|
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:55:33 GMT, "S Scalise"
<scalise747(remove)@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Well aren't you cute posting that jibberish using my name.
|
Well at least the dip shit isn't flooding newsgroups because he isn't
looking at the followups.
| Quote: | "S Scalise" <scalise747(remove)@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iOska.0875$uD5.440867@twister.southeast.rr.com...
and again at all sites I've monitored.
They fired her.
One of the more unusual Dumb-and-Dumber incidents was when a new hiree who
was quite happy with her new job - told all her friends in email - then
sent
an email "Subject: For your eyes only" into dttus.com, with an Excel
spreadsheet attached.
It contained detailed compensation numbers for an entire trading desk.
Technically it wasn't a Dumb-and-Dumber, more like a Dumber-to-Luckless,
because the recipient didn't request it.
Anyway, they fired her.
And Deloitte & Touche fired the recipient!!!
I guess they hold their people to very high standards: if you receive
something proprietary of another company's, you'd better report it to
management yourself.
No, Deloitte & Touche didn't spot the transfer.
We had to ask for our email "back".
********** end excerpt from 'Corruption at Salomon Brothers' **********
It just never stopped.
Here are three examples from category:
o Working on another job while within the firm
|
--
Mark Ferguson
Message-ID: <5a07596f.0411251110.5f6a25d9@posting.google.com>
The SpuN one is a rat bastard and cannot be trusted
"Why don't you ever go into detail about how you asked theBanana(tm)
to do research on Andrew Conru and AdultFriendFinder.com for you after
stating that the court had ordered you "not to" because of your
lawsuit?". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Greg Samson
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:09 am Post subject:
Please don't reply to the flood posting forgeries (was Re: D |
|
|
S Scalise wrote:
| Quote: | Aren't you cute using my name to post your garbage.
|
Please check the Followup-To: line before you respond to the garbage
postings - or better still, don't respond at all.
You've been tricked into replying to a garbage post with the followup
set to an unrelated newsgroup, news.admin.net-abuse.email, instead of
the one where the posting originally appeared. This causes a copy of
your garbage post, plus your reply, to appear there, and not in the
original newsgroup.
If you'd like to learn more, please come to the
news.admin.net-abuse.email newsgroup, where we discuss ways of curbing
email spam.
In any case, please don't respond to the flood posting forgeries!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sun Tsu
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 01, 2004 2:30 am Post subject:
Re: Dimension visibility prior to placement |
|
|
Bark Turd-of-SuN <ninkapoop@stop-spam.org> errered once AGAIN in
NANAE:
| Quote: |
Well aren't you cute posting that jibberish using my name.
Well at least the dip shit isn't flooding newsgroups because he
isn't looking at the followups.
|
Again, you remove all doubt of your st00pidity.
Dippy *is* the person responsible for flooding usefroup and here you
are saying he isn't.
This is another of those, "I'm tired of FBI child pr0n spam, but you
can't prove the FBI ever spammed me." The oness isn't on anyone else,
you fool, you said what you said.
This is your NANAE mantra ...
"You might wish to lighten up and read the wording of what I wrote.
What I wrote is not what you think I wrote. This means you either
did not read what I wrote or misinterpreted what I wrote."
As usual, your view of reality is that _everyone_else_
*misinterptrets* everything you say. Of course, _you_ are NEVER
wrong.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You're a pathetic old man.
Oh, yea,
DING!
SWITCH!
Cheers,
SuN
--
"I would not say the FBI on a whim. It looks to be official
sanctioning of multiple kiddie porn site where it even states
those involved are under age."
"This has all the making of an FBI kiddie porn spam run
and I am tired of kiddie porn spam from law enforcement."
-Mark Ferguson making a fool of himself yet again in NANAE
claiming that the FBI is a child pr0n spammer
Google Groups: View Thread "Tired of kiddie porn spammers?"
<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&c2coff=1&threadm=fbpbn0dq315s7b48d5oth9vt7nedt1tfs6 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wm James
Guest
|
| Posted:
Wed Dec 01, 2004 8:48 pm Post subject:
Re: Dimension visibility prior to placement |
|
|
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:55:33 GMT, "S Scalise"
<scalise747(remove)@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Well aren't you cute posting that jibberish using my name.
|
Perhaps he knew what you were thinking?
Seriously, you aren't paying attention to the groups you are posting
your replies to. A kook is posting forged junk messages to various
groups setting the followups to a group he's attempting to disrupt.
Your replies, tryingto tell everyone the obvious, are doing what he
wants unless you chage the group to the group you are reading when you
post the reply.
William R. James
| Quote: | "S Scalise" <scalise747(remove)@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:iOska.0875$uD5.440867@twister.southeast.rr.com...
and again at all sites I've monitored.
They fired her.
One of the more unusual Dumb-and-Dumber incidents was when a new hiree who
was quite happy with her new job - told all her friends in email - then
sent
an email "Subject: For your eyes only" into dttus.com, with an Excel
spreadsheet attached.
It contained detailed compensation numbers for an entire trading desk.
Technically it wasn't a Dumb-and-Dumber, more like a Dumber-to-Luckless,
because the recipient didn't request it.
Anyway, they fired her.
And Deloitte & Touche fired the recipient!!!
I guess they hold their people to very high standards: if you receive
something proprietary of another company's, you'd better report it to
management yourself.
No, Deloitte & Touche didn't spot the transfer.
We had to ask for our email "back".
********** end excerpt from 'Corruption at Salomon Brothers' **********
It just never stopped.
Here are three examples from category:
o Working on another job while within the firm
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in