| Author |
Message |
Steve
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:33 pm Post subject:
Re: Running Autocad in Linux? |
|
|
The BricsCad team would like to wish to you and your family an excellent and
happy new year. And may 2005 also be an especially successful year in
business!
======================================================================
As a great start to the new year, we're now offering the following promotion
that allows you to save even more when buying our products. Get a 33% PRICE
REDUCTION when you buy either :
3 copies of BricsCad V5 PRO for USD 650 (normal price USD 975)
or
3 copies of BricsCad V5 Classic for USD 450 (normal price USD 675)
To benefit from this 33% price reduction and to order 3 copies of BricsCad
V5 Classic or V5 PRO, click here :
https://estore.bricscad.com/default.jsp?promotion=true
This promotion runs only until January 31, 2005, so don't wait to act on
this special offer!
======================================================================
During 2004, our new product BricsCad V5 was introduced as a "near-clone of
AutoCADŽ". More and more companies decided to save a substantial amount of
money by switching over to the BricsCad V5 products. During 2005, we will
enhance our products further, and we will continue to add additional
functionality.
BricsCad V5, though close to AutoCADŽ, costs only a fraction (USD 225) of a
full AutoCADŽ version, while offering similar functionality in an "it
doesn't get much closer" interface. It is a fact that if you are an AutoCADŽ
user, you will need only half a day to get familiar with BricsCAD V5 and
continue your day-to-day job.
But see for yourself how close it is, by downloading and exploring BricsCad
V5 for 30 days. Go to
www.bricscad.com/about/download/downloadForm.jsp?product=BCAD and
download your BricsCad V5 30 day trial version.
A comparison of BricsCad V5 and AutoCADŽ can be found at
http://www.bricscad.com/about/solutions/design/intellicad/features.jsp
If you have further questions, don't hesitate to contact us at
mailto:backoffice@bricscad.com.
Best Regards,
Backoffice
www.bricscad.com
B R I C S C A D
backoffice@bricscad.com
--------------------------------------------------------
"Perfect Reign" <theperfectreign@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d5zndb9lmdi3.m1t9am2pc1fz.dlg@40tude.net...
| Quote: | On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:11:27 -0500, someone posing as Steve chisled in the
wall:
You could
Buy another computer with WindowsXpsp2 and network it to your Linux Box
with
samba.
Nah, woudn't want to downgrade.
Remember: Friends don't let friends use Windows XP.
--
kai - perfectreign at yahoo dot com
www.perfectreign.com
...a palm tree nodded at me last night
he said, hey you look so pale... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Avatar
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Jan 22, 2005 4:28 am Post subject:
Re: Running Autocad in Linux? |
|
|
Crossover Office will not run AutoCAD.
qCAD is quicker & very nice, but only 2D. I highly recommend it.
to run AutoCAD without downgrading to windoze you will need VMWare or Win4Lin.
In article <41f06ecd$1_3@newsfeed.slurp.net>,
Martin Shoemaker <hmspe@cableaz.com> writes:
| Quote: | Probably not. At least not work well. Stef Yoder had some success with
LT2002 (I think), but I haven't seen anything recent. One of the
problems is that AutoCad tends to directly read the keyboard rather than
going through the Windows API. How they get by with doing that and
still have Windows logo compliance is a mystery.
I think BricsCad has a linux beta for Intellicad.
Martin
Perfect Reign wrote:
I am on a new project where I'll be implementing Archibus/FM site wide. Of
course, we are using Autocad with this. We currently have 2002 but will be
upgrading to 2005 ASAP.
At work, I use Windows XP, which is okay for this system. At home, however,
I use SuSE Linux 9.2. I have tried installing both 2002 and 2004 in my
Linux system but with no luck. I'm using Crossover Office to obtain
Windows compatibility.
Without downgrading to Windows XP, is there any way to get Autocad to work
within Windows?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Perfect Reign
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:26 am Post subject:
Re: Running Autocad in Linux? |
|
|
Avatar wrote:
| Quote: | Crossover Office will not run AutoCAD.
qCAD is quicker & very nice, but only 2D. I highly recommend it.
to run AutoCAD without downgrading to windoze you will need VMWare or
Win4Lin.
|
Yes, I tried CX Office with both Autocad 2004 and 2005. Neither loaded
correctly.
I've tried getting a copy of VMWare to test before I buy, but haven't found
one...yet. Win4Lin, IIRC, gives you a new kernel, right? I want to stay
away from that.
I do have qCAD loaded for learning purposes.
Thanks for your answer!
--
kai
www.perfectreign.com
"i believe in what i'm doing, but what is it i'm doing here"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roberto Waltman
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Jan 23, 2005 4:38 am Post subject:
Re: Running Autocad in Linux? |
|
|
<theperfectreign@yahoo.com> wrote:
<...snip...>
| Quote: | I've tried getting a copy of VMWare to test before I buy, but haven't found
one...yet.
|
You can get a time-limited evaluation copy of VMWare. (Go to the
company's web site for details.)
Of course that would not be "running Autocad in Linux", but running
Autocad under some variation of a Windows OS, the later running on a
virtual machine under Linux.
Roberto Waltman.
[ Please reply to the group,
return address is invalid ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BG250
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Jan 26, 2005 5:48 pm Post subject:
Re: Running Autocad in Linux? |
|
|
He's one of these people who think Linux is some perfect operating system. I
don't often agree to M$'s money hungry tactics but Linux has its limitations
as well. Linux has had years to prove itself, yet remains on the periphery
of the OS market. I also have Linux and it has proven not to be a cure-all.
We use XP sp2 in the office and it performs well. I find the problems people
have are due to the lack of understanding the proper configuration of it.
My main gripe is that developers of high cost professional software such as
AutoCAD need to work to improve the stability of it. AutoCAD crashes due to
a problem with the dwg far too much. Better error trapping is in order. I've
never seen Windows XP crash (unless there was a hardware failure). People
who dealt with Windows 95, 98, ME (shudder) and perhaps NT (many vendors
could never get NT drivers right or no drivers at all) had valid complaints.
bg
"gruhn" <gruhn@deletehwb.com> wrote in message
news:ZvYHd.22$b6.17744@news.uswest.net...
| Quote: | Nah, woudn't want to downgrade.
Remember: Friends don't let friends use Windows XP.
So drawing isn't as important to you as playing with an OS?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Perfect Reign
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:18 pm Post subject:
Re: Running Autocad in Linux? |
|
|
Someone posing as BG250 dropped their pants and wrote on the wall:
(Top posting corrected.)
| Quote: |
"gruhn" <gruhn@deletehwb.com> wrote in message
news:ZvYHd.22$b6.17744@news.uswest.net...
Nah, woudn't want to downgrade.
Remember: Friends don't let friends use Windows XP.
So drawing isn't as important to you as playing with an OS?
|
Actually the reason I don't like XP has nothing to do with drawing or
playing with an OS.
I'd prefer to use a stable OS which isn't a downgrade from the previous
version. Here at home, I dual-boot Win2K and Linux. I use Windows when
necessary, but find it inconvenient and limiting. If the applications
exist on Linux, I'd prefer to use this OS. In addition, I'm not worried
about viruses/spyware on Linux, because they just can't happen like the do
in Windows NT (xp/2k). I still use Win2K because I believe it a fast and
fairly stable upgrade from NT4.
WinXP (a.k.a. NT 5.1) is a poor merge of Win2K and Me, with too many
limiting factors and stability issues. I won't use it at home.
| Quote: | He's one of these people who think Linux is some perfect operating system.
|
Actually I am not. I just think that Linux sucks less than Windows for a
modern OS. I've been using WinNT since it was called OS/2 1.3 and highly
recommended it for awhile, particularly when NT 4 came out in '96.
| Quote: | I don't often agree to M$'s money hungry tactics but Linux has its
limitations as well. Linux has had years to prove itself, yet remains on
the periphery of the OS market.
|
Your argument here is flawed - you equate popularity with quality. MS used
to have a decent OS (Nt 3.51/4) but has failed to keep up with the times.
It is only through their massive vendor influence that they've remained
anywhere near the top.
| Quote: | I also have Linux and it has proven not to
be a cure-all.
|
Nope - Linux cannot be a cure-all. I - for one - cannot run my ATI video
capture card drivers under Linux. Is that the fault of the OS? No. Just the
fact that ATI never wrote drivers for this card.
| Quote: | We use XP sp2 in the office and it performs well. I find
the problems people have are due to the lack of understanding the proper
configuration of it.
|
That is often the case. I have not this issue - in fact the issues I have
with stability and OS performance are well-known.
| Quote: |
My main gripe is that developers of high cost professional software such
as AutoCAD need to work to improve the stability of it.
|
I am very new to Autocad as I am now implementing a large-scale facilities
management project where AutoCAD is used in conjunction with Archibus/FM.
I agree with the stability. I find it crashes far too often. In addition,
the UI is pathetic, IMO.
However, many more applications crash on my WinXP machines than do on my 2K
machines. I am constantly sending those little error reports.
As for my Linux box, I've only had a few lesser-known apps crash, and have
never seen a BSOD.
--
kai
www.perfectreign.com
"i believe in what i'm doing, but what is it i'm doing here" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|