David Janes
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:10 am Post subject:
Re: Flexible springs in drawings |
|
|
"kenny" <kenny@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1debd20b53926c35989685@news.eclipse.co.uk...
| Quote: | There does however appear to be an unseen split in the variable section.
In the longer version the highlighting only picks up some of the quilt.
|
* Don't know if the flexibility business works on both solid or surface, but you'd
probably be better off making the thing a solid, if you can get away with it. It
it won't solidify, the problem could be the geometry (especially since you mention
a 'split').
Look for 'Info>Geom Checks'
* Check out the detailing options ('File>Properties>Drawing Options')
remove_cosms_from_xsecs no &
show_quilts_in_total_xsecs no. These can have something to do with the display of
quilts in cross sections.
* VSS for a spring? Okay, maybe, but why not helical sweep. I know this shouldn't
make a difference, but baby gets cornfoozed so easily, anyway (witness WF where it
can't even tell that a cut is supposed to go into solid material and invariably
tries to make it into thin air), why push it!!
| Quote: | That's the best I can explain.
The spring is not abnormal,2 dia wire 25 i/d and 300 long. Anything
over 120 long will not section.
|
I'm not sure if it's normal or not. Length should not be an issue, unless you're
talking about a split, where the surface comes apart, more and more, over a
continuous length. Again, make it solid. Also, surfaces get mighty cranky if
self-intersected, i.e., your parameter value makes it less than "solid" height, so
you have surfaces generating inside of each other.
David Janes
|
|